| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Aluin Chaput
Caldari
Mort's Navy
   |
Posted - 2009.08.17 03:11:00 -
[1]
I have never really understood why HACs are held in such high re guard by 0.0 alliances. decent dps/faster but no insurance. Sounds like a fancy suicide kit. Please enlighten me.
|
Aluin Chaput
Caldari
Mort's Navy
|
Posted - 2009.08.17 03:14:00 -
[2]
Touche, just sounds like a waste in general.
|
Aluin Chaput
Caldari
Mort's Navy
|
Posted - 2009.08.17 06:21:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Aluin Chaput on 17/08/2009 06:20:49
How do they fare busting and then forming gatecamps?
|
Aluin Chaput
Caldari
Mort's Navy
|
Posted - 2009.08.17 06:38:00 -
[4]
Well, I am looking for a ship that could (in gang/fleet) break up serious 0.00 bubblecamps.
|
Aluin Chaput
Caldari
Mort's Navy
|
Posted - 2009.08.17 07:12:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Aluin Chaput on 17/08/2009 07:12:40
Serious replies please. What do the big guys use to take down other alliance's defenses?
|
Aluin Chaput
Caldari
Mort's Navy
|
Posted - 2009.08.17 10:49:00 -
[6]
 Originally by: Darthewok
Originally by: Aluin Chaput
Serious replies please. What do the big guys use to take down other alliance's defenses?
this is the thing. in EVE there are 2 broad divisions of battles.
1) battles over strategic points and structures where ships fight to the bitter end because there is something at stake.
Short of Caps, BS is king for this (according to conventional tactics anyway) due to highest DPS, tank, range if fit.
2) roaming fights where people fight if the odds are good and run if they are not. people are perfectly willing to take and abandon positions as is convenient as there is nothing at stake. to maneuver, you need mobile ships so usually no BS.
HAC is king for this as they are the best at picking fights and running if the fights go against them.
In other words, static positional fight where neither side will run but go for a showdown, BS
Running around a bunch of systems trying to catch the other side off guard or at a disadvantage, HAC
To my meagre understanding anyway,
DE
So BSs = what is needed for gatecamp takeover on a serious level?
|
| |
|